Political Influence on Justice in Contemporary Democracies: Comparative Dynamics of Judicial Independence in the United Kingdom, Spain, France, and the United States

Authors

  • Saddiki Mohammed Doctoral researcher in Public Law and Political Science, Faculty of Legal, Economic and Social Sciences, Agdal, Mohammed V University in Rabat

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63883/ijsrisjournal.v5i3.733

Abstract

Judicial independence constitutes one of the foundational pillars of democratic governance and the rule of law. Nevertheless, contemporary democracies increasingly face tensions between political authorities and judicial institutions, particularly regarding judicial appointments, constitutional review, partisan polarization, and executive interference. This article examines the mechanisms and manifestations of political influence on justice through a comparative analysis of four democratic systems: the United Kingdom, Spain, France, and the United States. The study investigates how institutional configurations, constitutional traditions, and political cultures shape the autonomy of judicial systems and the vulnerability of courts to political pressures.

The article adopts a comparative institutional approach combining constitutional analysis, judicial governance studies, and political-legal theory. It evaluates formal guarantees of judicial independence alongside de facto political practices affecting judicial behavior and court legitimacy. Particular attention is devoted to the politicization of judicial appointments, the role of judicial councils, executive-legislative influence, and contemporary debates surrounding democratic backsliding and judicialization of politics.

The study argues that while all four systems formally protect judicial independence, the modalities of political influence differ significantly according to legal traditions and constitutional structures. The American model demonstrates strong ideological polarization in judicial appointments; Spain reveals tensions linked to party control over the General Council of the Judiciary; France illustrates executive-centered judicial administration; while the United Kingdom presents a comparatively restrained yet evolving model after constitutional reforms.

Keywords: Judicial Independence; Political Influence; Rule of Law; Comparative Constitutional Law; Judicial Governance.

 

 

Received Date: April 21, 2026

Accepted Date: May 12, 2026

Published Date: June 01, 2026

Available Online at: https://www.ijsrisjournal.com/index.php/ojsfiles/article/view/733

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-01

How to Cite

Saddiki Mohammed. (2026). Political Influence on Justice in Contemporary Democracies: Comparative Dynamics of Judicial Independence in the United Kingdom, Spain, France, and the United States. International Journal of Scientific Research and Innovative Studies, 5(3), 211–232. https://doi.org/10.63883/ijsrisjournal.v5i3.733